THE SHOW X-FILES
Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark — How a $75 Million Broadway Show Became a Safety Case Study
Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark is usually remembered through three numbers: $75 million, the most expensive production in Broadway history; 182 preview performances, the longest preview period Broadway had ever seen; and $1 million, the show’s estimated weekly running cost, also a record at the time.
Those numbers describe scale. They do not explain what actually went wrong. The more useful production question is narrower: what happens when a live aerial-stunt system, built at genuinely unprecedented scale for a Broadway house, is engineered and rehearsed on a schedule that keeps slipping under public and financial pressure?
A Broadway House Had to Become a Flying Rig
The production, with music and lyrics by U2’s Bono and The Edge and a book credited to director Julie Taymor, Glen Berger and Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa, was built around performers flying over the audience on wire rigs designed to recreate Spider-Man’s web-swinging movement—not as an occasional effect, but as a central, repeated staging device throughout the show.
The Foxwoods Theatre itself had to be structurally modified to support the aerial rigging designed by Jaque Paquin, with aerial choreography by Scott Rogers and Daniel Ezralow. Scenic design came from George Tsypin, costumes from Academy Award winner Eiko Ishioka, lighting from Tony winner Donald Holder, sound from Jonathan Deans and projections from Kyle Cooper. Both Tsypin’s scenic design and Ishioka’s costumes later received Tony nominations—evidence that individual design elements of the show were recognized as accomplished even as the production as a whole struggled.
That distinction matters. The show’s most persistent problems were not failures of design talent. They were failures of integration—getting an unprecedented number of custom-engineered systems to work together, identically, on a fixed schedule, night after night.
The Schedule Kept Slipping in Public
The production had originally been announced for a 2009 opening. It was delayed repeatedly—including, according to contemporary reporting, at least three separate postponements of opening night, one pushed back more than a month specifically so producers could “fine-tune” the show, including writing a new ending, before critics were permitted to review it.
By the time Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark officially opened on June 14, 2011, it had played 182 preview performances—more than any production in Broadway history. A preview period exists specifically to let a production find and fix problems before critics weigh in. A preview period nearly six times longer than a typical Broadway run’s few dozen previews indicates a show still actively troubleshooting fundamental systems, not polishing details.
The Injuries Were Not a Single Incident
Contemporary news coverage documented multiple separate aerial incidents rather than one isolated accident. A stunt performer fell approximately 30 feet after his safety harness malfunctioned. In a separate incident, a performer left unhooked from his rig fell into the orchestra pit, resulting in a coma and requiring surgery. On multiple occasions, the actor playing the Green Goblin was left suspended in mid-air for several minutes—in one reported case, roughly three minutes—after the character’s flight system failed mid-scene.
A New York state safety inspector was brought in to formally approve the production’s aerial systems before performances could continue—a regulatory step that itself signals how seriously the incidents were being treated outside the theatre industry’s usual internal review processes.
These were not variations of the same minor glitch. A harness malfunction, an unhooked performer, and a mechanical flight-system failure are three distinct categories of technical fault, each pointing to a different part of the rigging chain: individual safety equipment, pre-flight procedure, and the automated flying mechanism itself. A production experiencing failures across all three categories was not managing one weak link—it was still stabilizing an entire new discipline of Broadway stagecraft under performance conditions.
Producers Removed the Director Mid-Preview
In March 2011, with the show still in previews, producers removed Julie Taymor from her day-to-day directing role and brought in creative consultant Philip Wm. McKinley to rework and simplify the production. This was an unusually public and unusually late creative intervention—Taymor was, at the time, one of Broadway’s most decorated directors, known for The Lion King.
Removing a production’s original director during previews, rather than before rehearsals or after a full run, indicates that the disagreement was not about the show’s initial concept but about whether that concept was executable on a Broadway performance schedule at all—a distinction between artistic vision and operational feasibility that the production had not resolved before public previews began.
The Book That Documented It From Inside
Co-writer Glen Berger later published Song of Spider-Man: The Inside Story of the Most Controversial Musical in Broadway History, a first-person account of the production’s development. Its existence is itself notable: few Broadway productions generate a book-length account from one of their own creative team members while the wounds are still fresh, and its title explicitly frames the show’s legacy around controversy rather than achievement.
Berger’s own assessment, quoted in retrospective coverage, was blunt: before a production can be brilliant, it first has to be competent. That is a specific critique of sequencing—the show reportedly pursued spectacle-level ambition before the underlying mechanical and organizational systems were reliable enough to support it.
The Business Math Never Worked
Reported figures for the show’s total cost range from approximately $65 million during previews to a final figure near $75 million—either way, the most expensive production in Broadway history at the time. At a reported $1 million weekly running cost, contemporary analysis noted the show needed to sell out consistently for roughly two years simply to break even.
That arithmetic matters production-wise because it removes any margin for the kind of extended technical troubleshooting the aerial systems clearly still needed. A show with a smaller budget and lower weekly overhead can afford a longer, quieter preview period to solve mechanical problems. A show already carrying record-setting costs faces enormous pressure to open—and start generating box office revenue against that overhead—well before every system is fully proven.
Production Perspective — Why the Designers Got Nominated and the Show Still Struggled
George Tsypin’s scenic design and Eiko Ishioka’s costumes earned Tony nominations. That fact sits awkwardly beside the production’s reputation as a cautionary tale, but it points to something specific about where the failures actually occurred.
Individual departments—scenic composition, costume design, even much of the aerial choreography’s concept—were judged as genuinely accomplished work. What failed was the systems-integration layer sitting above those departments: the process of taking novel, custom-built rigging hardware, a compressed engineering timeline, and a fixed opening-night pressure, and reliably synchronizing all of it into a repeatable eight-times-a-week performance.
That is a production-management problem as much as a design problem. No single department is typically responsible for verifying that an entirely new category of stagecraft—mass-audience aerial performance at this scale, in a proscenium Broadway house never built for it—has been adequately tested before ticketed audiences arrive underneath it.
The Run Outlasted the Reputation
Despite its reputation as one of the most critically panned musicals—reviewed harshly on two separate occasions, once during previews and again at its delayed official opening—the production ran for 1,066 performances before closing in January 2014.
That run length complicates any simple narrative of total failure. The show was simultaneously among Broadway’s most technically troubled productions and commercially durable enough to play more than three years. Audience curiosity generated by the well-publicized difficulties may itself have sustained ticket sales for a period, separate from the production’s artistic reception.
Production Takeaway
Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark is frequently summarized as a story about a show that was simply too ambitious. That framing lets the real lesson slip past.
The production’s specific failure was sequencing: it committed to opening-night marketing, ticket sales and a fixed performance calendar before the underlying aerial engineering had been proven reliable at full production scale. Individually excellent scenic, costume and choreographic work could not compensate for a rigging system still failing in three distinct ways—equipment, procedure and mechanism—months into public performances.
The record-length preview period was not evidence of excessive caution. It was evidence that the show had opened its box office before it had actually finished being built.
References & Further Reading
Playbill — Director Julie Taymor Says Work Is Being Done on Spider-Man
New York Theater — Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark Five Years Later
CBS News — Spider-Man Delays Broadway Opening for 3rd Time
CBS News — Green Goblin Flight System Failure
IBDB — Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark Broadway Production
Next in THE SHOW X-FILES
Image Credits
All photographs remain the property of their respective photographers and copyright holders. Use only images whose licences, official press permissions or other applicable rights permit publication.
